Workshop “Psihanaliza relationala: perspective contemporane si controverse”, 24-26 septembrie

Fundatia Romano-Olandeza pentru Psihoterapie Psihanalitica (FROPP) in colaborare cu The International Association for Relational Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy (IARPP) organizeaza prima manifestare dedicata psihanalizei relationale, workshopul “Psihanaliza relationala: perspective contemporane si controverse”.

Dată: vineri, 24 septembrie 2010, orele 18.00-21.30; sâmbătă şi duminică, 25-26 septembrie 2010, orele 09.30-13.00, 14.15-17.30

Loc: Hotel Royal, Bucuresti.

Workshop-ul este destinat absolventilor si cursantilor FROPP, membrilor ARPP, cat si altor psihoterapeuti certificati, de orientare psihanalitica, din alte asociatii profesionale, in limita locurilor disponibile.

Workshop-ul va fi creditat de Colegiul Psihologilor din România şi de Colegiul Medicilor din România.

Desfasurarea lucrarilor are loc in limba engleza, fara traducere simultana.

Participantii vor primi anticipat lecturile recomandate de liderii lucrarilor.

Numarul de locuri maxim: 50

Taxa de participare: 550 RON. Plata taxei de participare include primirea materialelor de lucru recomandate mai sus.

Liderii workshop-ului: Jonathan H. Slavin, Ph.D. si Miki Rahmani, M.A. Jonathan H. Slavin, Ph. D, instructor clinic in psihologie, Harvard Medical School; ex-presedinte al Diviziei de psihanaliza (39), A. P. A (American Psychological Association); presedinte fondator al Institutului de psihanaliza din Massachusetts. Membru al Facultatii Institutului de Psihanaliza din Massachusetts si al Institutului de Psihanaliza din California de Nord. A functionat ca psiholog consultant pentru Ministerul Sanatatii al Statului Israel, pentru Ministerul Apararii din Israel si pentru Serviciul de Consiliere Palestinian.

Miki Rahmani, M. A., Universitatea Ebraica din Ierusalim si psiholog supervisor la Centrul de Sanatate Mentala din Ierusalim-Sud.

Miki Rahmani si Jonathan Slavin au predat subiecte legate de abordarea relationala in SUA, Israel, Rusia, Armenia si China.

Program şi lista de lecturi recomandate 

Tabloul evolutiv al psihanalizei din ultimii 30 de ani cuprinde aparitia unei nou mod de intelegere a dezvoltarii umane si a procesului psihanalitic. Ideile au aparut inca din lucrarile timpurii ale lui Winnicott, Sullivan si Kohut si au fost ulterior cristalizate in anii ’80 si ’90 in scrierile lui Mitchell, Greenberg, Hoffman, Benjamin, Ehrenberg, Davies, Renik, considerati fondatori ai conceptiei relationale. Lucrarile acestor ganditori relationali au influentat in special atat intelegerea relatiei terapeutice in psihoterapie si in psihanaliza, cat si a modului in care se petrece schimbarea.

In analiza revolutionara a teoriilor psihanalitice, Greenberg si Mitchell (1983) au subliniat contrastul dintre ideile “relationale” si modul de intelegere “traditional” (freudian-clasic sau kleinian) , separandu-le prin introducerea categoriilor de modele de “structura relationala” si de “structura pulsionala”.

In acest atelier se vor utiliza modelele lui Greenberg si Mitchell pentru a examina indeaproape ideile relationale despre dezvoltarea, structura mintii, despre originea conflictului si psihopatologie, despre natura transferului si a contratransferului, despre rolul si influenta analistului / psihoterapeutului in psihoterapie, despre cum vindeca analiza. In discutii se vor aborda si implicatiile asupra modului de lucru direct cu pacientii.

Pentru a incuraja focus-ul asupra travaliului clinic, participantii sunt solicitati sa aduca exemplificari cazuistice. Instructorii vor prezenta si ei material clinice pentru discutii.

Program si articole recomandate pentru workshop 

I. Constructia mintii: Cand stim ca existam? Experienta personala de agentie; psihologia persoanei unice, psihologia relatiei a doua persoane. Intersubiectivitatea
[The Construction of the Mind: When do we know we exist? The experience of personal agency. One person and two person psychologies. Intersubjectivity]

**Mitchell, S. and Black, M. (1995). Freud and Beyond: A History of Modern Psychoanalytic
Thought. New York: Basic Books. *What is psychoanalysis: Pages: xv-xxii; (Optional: Freud: 1-30); *Winnicott: 124-134; *Kohut: 149-163.

**Pollock, L. and Slavin, J. (1998). The struggle for recognition: Disruption and reintegration in the experience of agency. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 8: 857-873.
· Daca aveti timpul necesar, se recomanda si articolul listat la numarul 5 din lista de mai jos.

II. Perspective clasice si relationale: originile psihanalizei relationale la Freud, Ferenczi, Winnicott, Sullivan, Klein si Kohut
[Classical and Relational Perspectives: The origins of relational psychoanalysis in Freud, Ferenczi, Winnicott, Sullivan, Klein and Kohut]

**Mitchell, S. and Black, M. (1995). Freud and Beyond: A History of Modern Psychoanalytic
Thought. New York: Basic Books. *Controversies in Theory: 206-218.

***Freud, S. (1915). Observations on transference-love. Standard Edition, 12:159-171.
London: Hogarth Press, 1958. [***Acest articol va fi discutat indetaliat***]
*Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child. International Journal
of Psychoanalysis, 1949, 30, 225-230.
· Daca aveti timpul necesar, se recomanda si articolul listat la numarul 6 din lista de mai jos.

III. Transfer si contratransfer: ce este transferul; semnificatia contratransferului; enactmentul si experienta noua.
[Transference and Countertransference: What is transference? The meaning of countertransference. Enactment and new experience]

**Mitchell, S. and Black, M. (1995). Freud and Beyond: A History of Modern Psychoanalytic
Thought. New York: Basic Books. *Controversies in Technique: 229-250.

**Slavin, J. (1994). On making rules: Towards a reformulation of the dynamics of transference
in psychoanalytic treatment. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 4:253-274.
· Daca aveti timpul necesar, se recomanda si articolul listat la numarul 2 din lista de mai jos.

IV. Influenta analistului: neutralitate si autodezvaluirea. Iubirea analistului
[The Influence of the Analyst: Neutrality and self-disclosure. The analyst’s love]

**Ehrenberg, D.B. (1984) Psychoanalytic Engagement II. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 20
560-583.
**Slavin, J. (2007). The imprisonment and liberation of love: The dangers and possibilities of love in the psychoanalytic relationship. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 27:197-218.
**Renik, O. (1996). The perils of neutrality. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 65: 495-517.
· Daca aveti timpul necesar, se recomanda si articolul listat la numarul 10 si 11 din lista de mai jos.

V. Trauma si abuz sexual. Agentia revendicatoare
[Trauma and Sexual Abuse: Reclaiming agency]

**Slavin, J. and Pollock, L. (1997). The poisoning of desire: The destruction of agency and the recovery of psychic integrity in sexual abuse. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 33, 573-593.

Bibliografie generala – Selectie de scrieri fundamentale in psihanaliza relationala in ordinea datei de publicare

Carti:

Greenberg, J. and Mitchell, S. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mitchell, S. (1988). Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Articole:

1. Ehrenberg, D.B. (1982). Psychoanalytic engagement—The transaction as primary data. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 18:535-555.
1a. Ehrenberg, D.B. (1984). Psychoanalytic Engagement II. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 20, 560-583.
2. Hoffman, I. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19 (3), 389-422.
3. Greenberg, J.R. (1986). Theoretical models and the analyst’s neutrality. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 22:87-106.
4. Mitchell, S. (1988). Penelope’s Loom: Psychopathology and the Analytic Process, in Mitchell, Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. Benjamin, J. (1995, first published 1990). Recognition and destruction: An outline of intersubjectivity. Pages 27-48. In: Like Subjects, Love Objects: Essays on Recognition and Sexual Difference. Yale: New Haven.
6. Slavin, M.O., and Kriegman, D. (1990). Toward a new paradigm for psychoanalysis: An evolutionary biological perspective on the classical-relational dialectic. Psychoanalytic Psychology. 7S:5-31.
7. Hoffman, I. (1991). Discussion: Toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1 (1) 74-105.
8. Renik, O. (1993) Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 62:553-571.
8a. Renik, O. (1996). The perils of neutrality. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 65: 495-517.
9. Slavin, J. (1994). On making rules: Towards a reformulation of the dynamics of transference in psychoanalytic treatment. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 4:253-274.
10. Davies, J.M. (1994). Love in the Afternoon: A relational reconsideration of desire and dread in the countertransference. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 4:153-170.
11. Benjamin, J. (1995). What angel would hear me: The erotics of transference. In: Like Subjects, Love Objects: Essays on Recognition and Sexual Difference. Yale: New Haven, pp. 143–174.
12. Greenberg, J. (1995) Psychoanalytic technique and the interactive matrix. Psychoanalytic Quarterly,64: 1-22.

http://cafegradiva.blogspot.com/