(CNN) – In olden times, watching the presidential debates was a lonely, one-dimensional experience. Now, we have running Twitter commentary, instant fact-checks and liveblogs to help us digest the candidates’ various claims and arguments as they make them.
With all that noise comes an influx of opinions and biases that can skew how viewers interpret the debates. But one new tool hopes to bring a bit of impartial science to the viewing party.
Subscrieţi la Cafe Gradiva
Primiţi în flux sau email evenimentele, ideile şi interpretările cu sens.
